Where recorded compatibility evidence and finding-specific verification replace guesswork.
Audit
Record what each named protocol observed.
Diagnose
Trace each production finding to evidence.
Verify
Re-run the protocol required by the remediation.
These workflows need evidence about the page and protocol that actually ran. They do not need a universal score or a promise about downstream provider behavior.
Release owners
Did this release change what a direct consumer can acquire or extract?
Record the response and representations before a change, then verify each identified remediation against the same protocol set after deployment.
Publishers and content teams
Is meaningful page content available without client-side construction?
Use raw-versus-rendered and deterministic main-content evidence to find material delivery deficits without turning word counts into a quality score.
Search and schema specialists
Is supported structured data parseable and present in the initial response?
Separate syntax failure, browser-only markup, material visible-text mismatches, and genuine absence instead of collapsing them into one grade.
Legal, policy, and infrastructure teams
Which documented actor is allowed or disallowed for this exact path?
Review purpose-specific robots decisions for discovery, training, grounding, and user-action actors under an explicit audit profile.
CFOs and finance teams
Can we show exactly what AI consumers received — and what we fixed?
Present recorded acquisition evidence and verified fixes as accountability artifacts: what was blocked, what changed, and the rescan that verified the remediation.
Client delivery teams
Can the client see the evidence behind each recommendation?
Deliver white-label PDF audit reports: the protocol record, production findings, limitations, and a verification result for each implemented fix.
Operators
Did a previously fixed blocker return?
Track the same URL and compare immutable evidence bundles. Failed or incompatible candidate runs remain indeterminate rather than becoming a false regression claim.
Evidence-first API results expose the audit verdict, execution state, profile, protocols, findings, remediations, limitations, and verification summary. Where a secondary comparison index is present, it is labeled display-only and is never an input to the verdict.
Review the API contract